Skip to main content
· 3/27/2001

Gray, William v. Poole, Theisha

Citations

  • 243 F.3d 572
  • 345 U.S. App. D.C. 236
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4885
  • 2001 WL 289779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that suits are prohibited act within the scope of official duties, “even if the official is alleged to have acted in bad faith”
  • holding that District of Columbia attorneys are shielded by absolute immunity from liability in “initiating a prosecution” and ”presenting the State’s case” (citation omitted)
  • noting that in so holding, the D.C. Circuit had joined with every Circuit to have addressed the issue
  • extending absolute immunity to a government attorney for initiating a civil child neglect action
  • attorneys from District of Columbia corporation counsel’s office enjoy absolute immunity from liability for conduct in initiating and prosecuting child neglect action
  • “there is ‘a serious danger that ... [a]n individual targeted by an administrative proceeding will react angrily and may seek vengeance in the courts’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Randolph, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.