Gray v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defense expert testimony concerning diesel fuel antigel and flammable solvent, which testimony could have been presented at first arson trial to support defendant’s case, was not newly discovered material which would permit new trial based on newly discovered evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kelley v. Tomas
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-09· cited 36×
• State v. Weiner
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-13· cited 14×
• Channer v. State
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-24· cited 13×
• State v. Roberson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-20· cited 8×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Asherman v. State
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-03· cited 112×
• Steve Viglione Sheet Metal Co. v. Sakonchick
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-07-26· cited 100×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-29· cited 70×
• State v. Holliman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-02-20· cited 67×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-21· cited 50×
• Lombardo v. State
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-02-15· cited 39×
• State v. S & R Sanitation Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-02-17· cited 38×
• State v. Henderson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-01-27· cited 36×
• Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-05-28· cited 30×
• Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-22· cited 22×