Skip to main content

Gray v. State

Citations

  • 267 P.3d 667
  • 2011 Alas. App. LEXIS 149
  • 2011 WL 6116488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that Alaska’s cruel and unusual punishment prohibition concerns both “the characteristics of the penalty imposed” and “the characteristics of the offender”
  • acknowledging that Alaska’s cruel and unusual punishment prohibition concerns both “the characteristics of the penalty imposed” and “the characteristics of the offender”
  • reviewing sentence to determine if trial court gave juvenile offender’s prospects for rehabilitation “careful scrutiny and appropriate weight”
  • 109 years with 44 years suspended (65 years to serve) with parole eligibility after 21 years, 8 months
  • “A sentencing system that specifies progressively harsher penalties for more progressively serious classes of – 10 – 2789 For all these reasons, we agree with the superior court that the legislative classification adopted in AS 12.55.027(g

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.