Gray v. Russell Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the trial court properly excluded expert evidence in its entirety based on expert's failure to rely on sound data in forming his opinion
• finding that the plaintiffs have the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the employer’s articulated reasons for discharging the plaintiffs were pretextual
• finding that the plaintiffs have the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the employer's articulated reasons for discharging the plaintiffs were pretextual
• none of the evidence as to comparable incidents of discipline showed that discharge was pretextual
• applying McDonnell Douglas standard to FCRA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).