Gray v. Morton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the FCRA applied to the defendant state university, an arm of the State
• holding that the plaintiffs’ alleged privacy violations were not “a concrete consequential damage”
• dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s disclosure requirements because plaintiffs “did not suffer a concrete consequential damage as a result of [the defendant’s alleged breach of the [Fair Credit Reporting Act]”
• granting motion to dismiss for lack of standing because plaintiffs alleging invasion of privacy “admitted that they did not suffer a concrete consequential damage as a result of [defendant’s] alleged breach of the FCRA” and thus lacked an injury-in- fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).