Skip to main content
· 1/7/1889

Gray v. McFall

Citations

  • 1 Monag. 176
  • 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1270

Syllabus

<p>A case stated was framed between a landlord and the sheriff, the landlord claiming, from a fund realized by a sheriff’s sale, a year’s rent due by the defendant in the execution; but it seemed that the money was not paid into court and there was no aqreement that it should be treated as if so paid. The plaintiffs in the execution, by agreement filed, admitted the facts contained in the case slated, for the purpose of having the case decided. The court entered judgment for the plaintiff. On writ of error, held that, as there was no case before the supreme court, proper for consideration, the writ should be quashed.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.