Gray v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Supreme Court of Virginia precedent “clearly stands for the proposition that testing a radar device by tuning forks alone is sufficient to prove the accuracy of the equipment, a position widely adopted by other jurisdictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jeffrey D. Wells v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2016-01-26· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Fagin
  Virginia Circuit Court· 2003-04-04
• United States v. Walker
  E.D. Virginia· 2012-08-07

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ingram v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-01-07· cited 59×
• Crews v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-01-06· cited 51×
• Royals v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1957-03-11· cited 17×
• Watson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-09-21· cited 15×
• Farmer v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1964-11-30· cited 15×
• Carroll v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-08-21· cited 13×
• Sweeny v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1971-03-08· cited 11×
• Thomas v. City of Norfolk
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1966-04-25· cited 10×
• Crews v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1987-09-04· cited 10×
• Biesser v. Town of Holland
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1967-09-08· cited 9×
• Myatt v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-10-09· cited 8×
• State v. Kincaid
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-04-13· cited 8×
• Crosby v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1963-04-22· cited 7×