Skip to main content
· 6/5/2009

Gray v. City of Valley Park, Mo.

Citations

  • 567 F.3d 976
  • 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 408
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12075
  • 2009 WL 1563457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that federal courts must “satisfy themselves” that jurisdictional requirements are met “before reaching the merits of a case”
  • considering but ultimately not applying the doctrine where a party took inconsistent positions before the district and appellate courts.
  • recognizing the doctrine of judicial estoppel and its purpose
  • owners of rental properties had to incur costs in altering their hiring procedures to ensure that they complied with the challenged ordinance
  • the plaintiff has standing if his or her conduct is clearly proscribed by the government regulation
  • “[T]he discretionary determination to apply the doctrine of judicial estoppel is made on a case-by-case basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Chief Judge, Beam and Arnold, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.