· 6/5/2009
Gray v. City of Valley Park, Mo.
Citations
- 567 F.3d 976
- 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 408
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12075
- 2009 WL 1563457
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that federal courts must “satisfy themselves” that jurisdictional requirements are met “before reaching the merits of a case”
- considering but ultimately not applying the doctrine where a party took inconsistent positions before the district and appellate courts.
- recognizing the doctrine of judicial estoppel and its purpose
- owners of rental properties had to incur costs in altering their hiring procedures to ensure that they complied with the challenged ordinance
- the plaintiff has standing if his or her conduct is clearly proscribed by the government regulation
- “[T]he discretionary determination to apply the doctrine of judicial estoppel is made on a case-by-case basis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Chief Judge, Beam and Arnold, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.