Gray v. Chater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering remand because evidence did not support that the applicant could stand for two hours of a workday
• Commissioner did not meet burden by pointing to reports that merely indicated “a lack of definitive evidence that the plaintiff cannot perform sedentary work”
• “Workers’ compensation determinators are directed to the worker’s prior employment and measure the ability to perform that employment rather than using the definition of disability in the Social Security Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).