Gray v. Carlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \a plain reading of [ISTEA] reveals that Congress meant to permit [a public authority] to continue collecting tolls of whatever amount without having to repay federal funds-something that it was previously barred from doing once it satisfied its debt obligations\ (emphasis omitted
• “Congress need not expressly state that it is authorizing a 7 state to engage in activity that would otherwise violate the [d]ormant Commerce 8 Clause.”
• “We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision that a party did not waive an argument by failing to raise it earlier in the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).