Gray Lines Tour v. Interstate Commerce Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that “the district court wisely deferred ruling on attorney’s fees and costs pending appeal”
• explaining “a lesser standard of proof is applicable to proof of the amount of damages”
• approving of trial court’s decision to defer ruling on fee petition requesting over $18 million for nearly 120,000 attorney hours
• “[R]ather than undertaking the time-consuming task of determining a reasonable attorney’s fee, only to see the effort overturned on appeal, the district court wisely deferred ruling on attorney’s fees and costs pending appeal.”
• “At base, an antitrust plaintiffs’ damages should reflect the difference between its performance in a hypothetical market free of all antitrust violations and its actual performance in the market infected by the anticompetitive conduct.”
• “[I]f an antitrust plaintiff alleges that 27 the defendant engaged in unlawful acts A, B, C, and D, and acts C and D are later rejected as a 1 if acts A and B support the entire damage award, it must be sustained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).