Skip to main content
· 12/2/2013

Graves v. Howerton

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 690
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 559
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3329
  • 571 U.S. 1076
  • 2013 WL 5309247
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that factual findings after a bench trial are reviewed for clear error
  • applying abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a district court’s fee determination under state law
  • applying abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a district court’s fee determination under state law
  • “Rescission is an equitable remedy, the use of which is generally left to the courts’ discretion.”
  • “The disposition of this case could have a substantial impact . . . in New York State. . . . We accordingly certify the following two questions . . . .” (emphasis added)
  • district courtʹs factual findings reviewed for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.