· 12/2/2013
Graves v. Howerton
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 690
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 559
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3329
- 571 U.S. 1076
- 2013 WL 5309247
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8643
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that factual findings after a bench trial are reviewed for clear error
- applying abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a district court’s fee determination under state law
- applying abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a district court’s fee determination under state law
- “Rescission is an equitable remedy, the use of which is generally left to the courts’ discretion.”
- “The disposition of this case could have a substantial impact . . . in New York State. . . . We accordingly certify the following two questions . . . .” (emphasis added)
- district courtʹs factual findings reviewed for clear error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.