Graves, Cox & Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• turning to “well-established” case law to interpret the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, ch. 9.94A RCW
• explaining that RCW 9.94A.585(4) contains three distinct three prongs
• exceptional sentences cannot be \based on factors personal in nature to a particular defendant.\
• two-part test governs the question of whether a nonenumerated factor qualifies for departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).