Graval v. P.T. Bakrie & Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “By all indications, court-directed service under Rule 4(f)(3) is as favored as service available under Rule 4(f)(1) or Rule 4(f)(2)”
• “Under California law, service on a subsidiary does not constitute service on a parent corporation, even if the subsidiary is considered to be an ‘alter-ego’ of the parent corporation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).