Grate v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the law does not require an appellant be pleased with the results of the decision to enter a guilty plea, but rather, the decision must be knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made
• stating that the law does not require an appellant be pleased with the results of the decision to enter a guilty plea, but rather, the decision must be knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made
• noting that “[a] defendant is bound by the statements made during the plea colloquy, and a defendant may not later offer reasons for withdrawing the plea that contradict statements made when he pled”
• noting that a defendant is bound by the statements made during the plea colloquy, and a defendant may not later offer reasons for withdrawing the plea that contradict statements made when he pleaded guilty
• noting that a defendant need not be pleased with the results of the decision to enter a guilty plea; all that is required is that the defendant’s decision to plead guilty be knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made
• stating, “[a] defendant is bound by the statements made during the plea colloquy, and a defendant may not later offer reasons for withdrawing the plea that contradict statements made when he[, or she,] pled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).