Graphic Communications International Union v. Quebecor Printing Providence, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, of the four Pioneer factors, the excuse given for the late filing “must have the greatest import”
• stating that although the U.S. Supreme Court, in Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 507 U.S. 380 (1993
• affirming denial by district court of Rule 4(a)(5) extension because lateness \was the result of ignorance of the law and inattention to detail \
• affirming denial of extension because late filing was result of ignorance of the law and “inattention to detail”
• describing equitable tolling as a “narrow safety valve[]” reserved for “instances of clear injustice”
• finding of excusable neglect is not based on misunderstanding of the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).