Skip to main content
· 10/3/1994

Grantors to Diaz Refinery PRP Committee Site Trust v. Employers National Insurance

Citations

  • 318 Ark. 171
  • 884 S.W.2d 591
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In determining whether a matter is subject to effective appellate review, we ask whether the relief sought would be barred by the entry of final judgment in the trial court.”
  • the “interlocutory appeal statute is not a run-of-the-mill procedural provision. It is a jurisdictional law by which the General Assembly has limited the authority of Georgia’s appellate courts to hear certain cases.”
  • the “interlocutory appeal statute is not a run-of-the-mill procedural provision. It is a jurisdictional law by which the General Assembly has limited the authority of Georgia’s appellate courts to hear certain cases.”
  • the “interlocutory appeal statute is not a run-of-the-mill procedural provision [but instead] is a jurisdictional law by which the General Assembly has limited the authority of Georgia’s appellate courts to hear certain cases”
  • the “interlocutory appeal statute is not a run-of-the-mill procedural provision [but instead] is a jurisdictional law by which the General Assembly has limited the authority of Georgia’s appellate courts to hear certain cases”
  • trial court’s failure to rule on a motion for certificate of immediate review within the time period in which the trial could act to grant such motion meant that the trial court implicitly denied the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.