Skip to main content
· 10/4/2017

Grantham v. Hornbeck Agricultural Group, LLC

Citations

  • 2017 Ark. App. 520
  • 529 S.W.3d 666
  • 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if one reason supporting a dismissal is not a 19 reason enumerated under § 1915A, then that reason “saves” the dismissal from counting as a strike
  • holding that if one reason supporting a dismissal is not a 20 reason enumerated under § 1915A, then that reason “saves” the dismissal from counting as a strike
  • concluding that there are cases where immunity may be so clear on the face of the complaint that a dismissal may qualify as a strike as 26 frivolous or for failure to state a claim
  • recognizing dismissal proper where 27 affirmative defenses are “clear on the face of the complaint”
  • stating that 25 dismissal on immunity grounds may qualify as a strike for failure to state a claim where the immunity defense is clear on the face of the complaint
  • stating that dismissal on 25 immunity grounds may qualify as a strike for failure to state a claim where the immunity defense 26 is clear on the face of the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waymond M. Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.