· 10/4/2017
Grantham v. Hornbeck Agricultural Group, LLC
Citations
- 2017 Ark. App. 520
- 529 S.W.3d 666
- 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 580
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if one reason supporting a dismissal is not a 19 reason enumerated under § 1915A, then that reason “saves” the dismissal from counting as a strike
- holding that if one reason supporting a dismissal is not a 20 reason enumerated under § 1915A, then that reason “saves” the dismissal from counting as a strike
- concluding that there are cases where immunity may be so clear on the face of the complaint that a dismissal may qualify as a strike as 26 frivolous or for failure to state a claim
- recognizing dismissal proper where 27 affirmative defenses are “clear on the face of the complaint”
- stating that 25 dismissal on immunity grounds may qualify as a strike for failure to state a claim where the immunity defense is clear on the face of the complaint
- stating that dismissal on 25 immunity grounds may qualify as a strike for failure to state a claim where the immunity defense 26 is clear on the face of the complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waymond M. Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.