Grant v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While the concurring opinion concludes that the trial judge prevented the introduction of irrelevant evidence and curtailed the introduction of repetitious and confusing evidence, our review of the record does not permit us to join in that assessment of the trial judge’s activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mathew v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-26· cited 20×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-27· cited 3×
• William Lee v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-27

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sparks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-30· cited 37×
• Love v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-16· cited 25×