Grant v. State
Citations
- 33 Fla. 291
Syllabus
<p>1. Before a verdict returned by a.jury in cases of felony is complete it must be accepted by the court for record. At any time after the verdict is returned into court, and before it is accepted by the court for record, the accused has the right to have the jury polled in order to ascertain if the verdict offered is unanimous, and in the absence of a polling of the jury any member thereof has the right sua sponte to recede from the verdict agreed upon at any time before it is accepted for record.</p> <p>2. At common law the verdict of the jury in cases of felony was pronounced in open court, then entered on the record by the clerk, and after this affirmed by the entire jury, when it became complete. The manner of receiving and affirming verdicts in cases of felony discussed.</p> <p>3. 'When a jury returns into court an informal, insensible, or a. repugnant verdict, or one that is not responsive to the issues-submitted, they may be directed by the court to reconsider it, and present a verdict in proper form. The court should, however, use great caution, and not intimate to the jury the kind of verdict in substance that should be returned.</p> <p>4. After the case had been submitted to the jury under the charge-of the court they returned into court the following verdict, viz: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of manslaughter-in the first degree.” The court refused to accept this verdict, and stated to the jury that it was not in proper form, as there were no degrees in manslaughter, and that they must retire- and present a verdict in proper form. The jury retired and returned the following verdict, viz: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of murder in the first- degree, and recommend: him to the mercy of the court,” and this verdict was accepted by the court: Held, that the court did not err in refusing to-receive the first verdict and in accepting the second one.</p> <p>5. In the opinion of a majority of this court, the testomony in the-record is not s
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-10-14· cited 545×
- Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-24· cited 192×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 62×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-03· cited 57×
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-12-17· cited 44×
- Mark James Asay v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-08-14· cited 42×
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-02-12· cited 39×
- Register v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1911-11-20· cited 34×
- State Ex Rel. Myers v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court· 1961-11-08· cited 32×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-13· cited 28×
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 26×
- Stevens Markets, Inc. v. MarkantonatosSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-06-29· cited 24×
- Groves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1926-04-16· cited 16×
- State v. McCafferyMontana Supreme Court· 1895-04-15· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-03-03· cited 15×
- Brutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-23· cited 10×
- Reyes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-01-15· cited 8×
- Dykman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-09-10· cited 7×
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 7×
- OGUNDIPE v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-25· cited 6×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1859-01-24· cited 62×
- Pinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 37×
- Givens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1893-01-12· cited 27×
- People v. BonneyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1861-07-01· cited 21×
- Coffee v. GrooverSupreme Court of Florida· 1883-06-15· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. DurfeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1868-10-15· cited 15×
- Dornick v. ReichenbackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1823-06-02· cited 7×
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1860-12-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.