Grant v. South Carolina Coastal Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a due process claim raised for the first time on appeal was not preserved
• holding alleged errors in a trial court’s order must be raised in a Rule 59 motion to be preserved for appellate review
• holding a party who did not file a motion to alter or amend an order failed to preserve its argument regarding the order's perceived deficiencies
• holding \neither [an appellate court] nor the [ALC] may substitute [its] judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact\
• finding that an inaccuracy in the trial court’s order must be raised to the trial court by way of a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment before the inaccuracy may be challenged on appeal
• finding that an inaccuracy in the trial court’s order must be raised to the trial court by way of a motion to alter or amend a judgment before the inaccuracy may be challenged on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).