Grant v. Silvestri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Wyoming did not have standing to challenge the Interior Department’s exchange of land rich in coal because it could not show that the Department would have leased the land for coal mining and thus have entitled Wyoming to royalties
• holding that Wyoming did not have standing to challenge the Interior Department’s exchange of land rich in coal because it could not show that the Department would have leased the land for coal mining and thus have entitled Wyoming to royalties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).