Skip to main content
· 11/1/1991

Grant v. Newsome

Citations

  • 411 S.E.2d 796
  • 201 Ga. App. 710
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding wardens of prison who froze inmate account did not give rise to federal § 1983 action because adequate state post deprivation remedy was available to redress inmate’s property damage
  • contemplating that a plaintiff in a conversion action may recover, inter alia, lost interest, punitive damages, as well as 15 v. Prickett, 297 Ga. 589, 597 (1) (774 SE2d 688) (2015
  • finding O.C.G.A. § 51-10-1 and O.C.G.A. § 9-11-69 are adequate post-deprivation remedies that preclude prisoner's due process claim alleging property loss
  • explaining O.C.G.A. § 51-10-1 applied to claim by prisoner that warden had improperly frozen and deprived prisoner use of funds in inmate trust account
  • explaining O.C.G.A. § 51-10-1 applied to claim by prisoner that warden had improperly frozen and deprived prisoner use of funds in inmate trust account
  • explaining O.C.G.A. § 51-10-1 applied to claim by prisoner that warden had improperly frozen and deprived prisoner use of funds in inmate trust account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Beasley, Carley, Shulman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.