D. Oregon· 2/22/1991
Grant v. Johnson
Citations
- 757 F. Supp. 1127
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2298
- 1991 WL 23011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing liberty interests implicated by appointment of temporary guardians; holding that former statutes governing appointment of temporary guardians did not comport with fundamental due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frye
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maness v. DailyAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-05-16· cited 17×
- State v. JohansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-22· cited 8×
- Spady v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-08-05· cited 2×
- Fellows v. RaymondD. Maine· 1994-01-14· cited 1×
- Chavis v. New York Temporary State Commission on LobbyingNew York Supreme Court· 2004-08-09
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 1,913×
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,747×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotNinth Circuit· 1976-02-23· cited 183×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.