Grant v. Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial judge is in a position to observe the parties, hear their testimony from the witness stand, observe their conduct and demeanor, and determine their credibility and weigh the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hardiman v. Hardiman
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1972-07-25· cited 34×
• Eppley v. Eppley
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1976-02-06· cited 23×
• Stigall v. Stigall
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1972-02-02· cited 22×
• Jackman v. Jackman
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-04-10· cited 18×
• Mathews v. Mathews
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1972-02-08· cited 16×
• Chaleff v. Chaleff
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1969-04-29· cited 13×
• Plese v. Plese
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1970-04-23· cited 12×
• Terry v. Terry
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1974-06-28· cited 10×
• Hibbard v. Hibbard
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1974-09-10· cited 7×
• Cross v. Cross
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1974-03-26· cited 7×
• Miller v. Miller
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1970-03-26· cited 5×
• Widmer v. Widmer
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-03-01· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Draime v. Draime
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1961-03-29· cited 21×
• Estate of Alexander v. Alexander
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1966-01-14· cited 15×
• Tomchany v. Tomchany
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1962-10-04· cited 12×
• Proctor v. Proctor
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1955-03-31· cited 11×
• Becker v. Becker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1966-06-03· cited 8×
• Scott v. Scott
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1965-07-16· cited 6×
• Holst v. Holst
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1965-12-03· cited 4×