Grant v. Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In a controversy relating to marriage the Court is concerned not only with the rights of the individuals involved but also with the public interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davidson v. Gregory
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1989-06-05· cited 58×
• Emery v. Emery
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1965-08-09· cited 33×
• Holliday v. Holliday
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-11-11· cited 11×
• Ortowski v. Ortowski
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-01-13· cited 8×
• Strickland v. Rabon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-02-26· cited 6×
• Lanier v. Lanier
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1968-04-11· cited 5×
• Rajcich v. Rajcich
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-05-03· cited 4×
• Carpenter v. Burr
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 4×
• Davis v. Davis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-04-14· cited 4×
• Newberry v. Newberry
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-11-12· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simon v. Flowers
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-07-23· cited 43×
• Marthers v. Hurst
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-03-21· cited 13×
• Ward v. MILLER
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-11-29· cited 11×
• Alexander v. Hutchins
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-03-14· cited 8×
• Zani v. Zani
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-12-23· cited 7×
• Royal-Liverpool Insurance Group v. McCarthy
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-03-07· cited 6×
• Brock v. Brock
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-05-05· cited 5×