Grant Parish Policy Jury v. Rapides Parish Policy Jury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and \how those questions\ would have resulted in favorable testimony
• holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when the petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and \how those questions\ would have resulted in favorable testimony
• holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and \how those questions\ would have resulted 130 CR-2023-0206 in favorable testimony
• holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when the petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and \how those questions\ would have resulted 125 CR-2023-0206 in favorable testimony
• \ '[D]ecisions regarding whether and how to conduct cross-examinations and what evidence to introduce are matters of trial strategy and tactics.' \ (quoting Rose v. State, 258 Ga. App. 232, 236, 573 S.E.2d 465, 469 (2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).