Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, PC v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in an appeal from a district court’s judgment reviewing a bankruptcy court’s decision, “we review the bankruptcy court’s orders directly”
• listing factors to consider when determining whether to appoint counsel under § 3006A, including whether the merits of the claim are colorable, and the complexity of the legal issues raised
• action for turnover under § 542(e) does not require the information to be property of the estate
• “[A]n action for turnover under § 542(e) does not require that the information be property of the estate.”
• “In fact, thus far, courts have only applied the ultra vires exception to the actual wrongful seizure of property by a trustee or receiver.”
• “In fact, thus far, courts have only applied the ultra vires exception to the actual wrongful seizure of property by a trustee or receiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).