Granite Construction Company v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a contract must be interpreted “in a manner which gives reasonable meaning to all its parts and avoids conflicts or surplusage of its provisions.”
• recognizing the Board “may reject even uncontroverted expert testimony when it is intrinsically unpersuasive”
• “The lack of government inspection does not relieve the contractor of the burden of providing conforming materials under the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).