Skip to main content
· 1/26/1894

Granger's Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of San Francisco

Citations

  • 101 Cal. 198
  • 35 P. 642
  • 1894 Cal. LEXIS 1006

Syllabus

<p>Prohibition—Supreme Court—New Trial—Rehearing.—A petition for a rehearing, and not a motion for a new trial, is the proper remedy for one desiring a rehearing of an original petition in the supreme court for a writ of prohibition, after a decision has been rendered thereupon.</p> <p>Id.—Constitutional Law—Construction of Code—Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court.—The constitution of the state and the rule making a judgment rendered in the supreme court final unless a rehearing is granted within thirty days do not make any distinction between cases of appellate, and cases of original, jurisdiction; and the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regulating new trials have no application to proceedings instituted in the supreme court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disapproved on other grounds, R. M. Rose & Co. v. State, 133 Ga. 353 (65 SE 770) (1909)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.