Granger's Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of San Francisco
Citations
- 101 Cal. 198
- 35 P. 642
- 1894 Cal. LEXIS 1006
Syllabus
<p>Prohibition—Supreme Court—New Trial—Rehearing.—A petition for a rehearing, and not a motion for a new trial, is the proper remedy for one desiring a rehearing of an original petition in the supreme court for a writ of prohibition, after a decision has been rendered thereupon.</p> <p>Id.—Constitutional Law—Construction of Code—Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court.—The constitution of the state and the rule making a judgment rendered in the supreme court final unless a rehearing is granted within thirty days do not make any distinction between cases of appellate, and cases of original, jurisdiction; and the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regulating new trials have no application to proceedings instituted in the supreme court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disapproved on other grounds, R. M. Rose & Co. v. State, 133 Ga. 353 (65 SE 770) (1909)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.