D. Colorado· 4/25/1988
Granger v. Harris (In Re Harris)
Citations
- 85 B.R. 858
- 5 Bankr. Ct. Rep. 127
- 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 646
- 17 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 655
- 1988 WL 39032
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that no court has found that litigation costs alone justify continuation of the stay
- holding that vacating the automatic stay is appropriate where “no great prejudice will result to the debtor” and “the hardship to the creditor resulting by continuing the stay considerably outweighs the hardship to the debtor by modification of the stay.”
- “While the cost of defending in a civil action has been given serious consideration by bankruptcy courts, no case has found the cost of defending, by itself, to be ‘great prejudice’ . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sidney B. Brooks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Ralph L. WALKER, Debtor. Ralph L. WALKER, Appellee, v. Robert WILDE, Monty Higley and Jonnie Higley, AppellantsTenth Circuit· 1991-03-13· cited 91×
- Landsing Diversified Properties-II v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Western Real Estate Fund, Inc.)Tenth Circuit· 1990-12-28· cited 77×
- McMullen v. Sevigny (In Re McMullen)First Circuit· 2004-10-20· cited 67×
- Polysat, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co. (In Re Polysat, Inc.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-04-15· cited 35×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1991-01-23· cited 27×
- In Re DoarN.D. Georgia· 1999-05-05· cited 19×
- Peterson v. Cundy (In Re Peterson)D. Colorado· 1990-06-28· cited 18×
- In Re JohnsonD. Minnesota· 1989-09-27· cited 14×
- In Re GibsonW.D. Arkansas· 1994-09-06· cited 10×
- Walker v. Wilde (In Re Walker)D. Utah· 1988-09-30· cited 9×
- Stoneking v. Histed (In Re Stoneking)M.D. Florida· 1998-07-13· cited 9×
- Reeves v. Columbia Gas of Ohio (In Re Reeves)N.D. Ohio· 2001-04-23· cited 6×
- Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund Ltd. v. Garcia-PadillaD. Puerto Rico· 2016-11-15· cited 6×
- Ain v. Myers (In Re Ain)D. Colorado· 1996-03-06· cited 3×
- HDR Architecture, P.C. v. Maguire Group Holdings (In re Maguire Group Holdings, Inc.)S.D. Florida· 2014-12-24· cited 3×
- Reyes v. McCarleyColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-12-30· cited 2×
- Landsing Diversified Properties-II v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Tenth Circuit· 1990-12-28· cited 1×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,006×
- In the Matter of Charles Holtkamp and Holtkamp Farms, Inc., Debtors-Appellants. Charles Holtkamp and Holtkamp Farms, Inc. v. Ronald E. LittlefieldSeventh Circuit· 1982-02-01· cited 294×
- Matter of McGrawW.D. Wisconsin· 1982-02-25· cited 65×
- Terry v. Johnson (In Re Terry)E.D. Wisconsin· 1981-07-16· cited 26×
- Shade v. Fasse (In Re Fasse)D. Colorado· 1984-06-27· cited 25×
- Layfield v. Director of Public Safety of Alabama (In Re Layfield)N.D. Alabama· 1981-07-20· cited 15×
- Sam Daily Realty, Inc. v. Department of Commerce & Consumer Affairs (In Re Sam Daily Realty, Inc.)D. Hawaii· 1985-12-10· cited 10×
- Green v. Han Mok Yang (In Re Green)S.D. Ohio· 1983-05-06· cited 9×
- Barlow v. Phillips (In Re Phillips)D. Colorado· 1984-06-27· cited 8×
- Chetelat v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR ARAPAHOE COUNTYSupreme Court of Colorado· 1978-11-27· cited 7×
- Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (In Re Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.)W.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-09-02· cited 1×
- Heim v. Schierholz (In re Schierholz)D. Colorado· 1985-08-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.