Granger v. Harris (In Re Harris)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that no court has found that litigation costs alone justify continuation of the stay
• holding that vacating the automatic stay is appropriate where “no great prejudice will result to the debtor” and “the hardship to the creditor resulting by continuing the stay considerably outweighs the hardship to the debtor by modification of the stay.”
• “While the cost of defending in a civil action has been given serious consideration by bankruptcy courts, no case has found the cost of defending, by itself, to be ‘great prejudice’ . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).