Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. DeMoonie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a residency requirement existed where the policy defined the covered premises as “the one or two family dwelling where you reside”
• concluding that a residency requirement existed where the policy defined the covered premises as “the one or two family dwelling where you reside”
• stating that provisions in a policy excluding specific items from coverage in the event of vacancy do not negate the requirement that the insured reside in the insured premises
• “Courts have no more right by strained construction to make an insurance policy more beneficial by extending the coverage contracted for than they would have to increase the amount of coverage.” (punctuation omitted)
• “Courts have no more right by strained construction to make an insurance policy more beneficial by extending the coverage contracted for than they would have to increase the amount of coverage.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).