Grange Indemn. Ins. Co. v. Hinds
Citations
- 228 N.E.3d 714
- 2023 Ohio 4085
Syllabus
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT INSURANCE POLICY INTERPRETATION EXCLUSION DOG BITE. The trial court erred, in part, in declaring that plaintiff-appellee is excused from indemnifying defendant-appellee from liability from claims asserted against him by defendant-appellant from dog-bite injuries because genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether the dog was reacting to protect people or property from imminent harm in the instances that he caused bodily injury to a person or injury to another animal.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.