Skip to main content

Grandison v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 514 F. Supp. 2d 12
  • 182 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2992
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70459
  • 2007 WL 2781892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing claim because the plaintiff merely “allege[d], in conclusory fashion, that [the defendant’s] actions in terminating [the plaintiff] were ‘extreme and outrageous and willfully performed [and] caused severe emotional distress to [the plaintiff]’”
  • “[When plaintiff’s] . . . common-law claims implicitly assert that his rights . . . are superior to [defendant’s] rights under the CBA[, t]he only way such allegations could be adjudicated would be to interpret [defendant’s rights] under the CBA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Grandison v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.