Skip to main content
· 9/25/2007

Grandison v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 514 F. Supp. 2d 12
  • 182 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2992
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70459
  • 2007 WL 2781892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing claim because the plaintiff merely “allege[d], in conclusory fashion, that [the defendant’s] actions in terminating [the plaintiff] were ‘extreme and outrageous and willfully performed [and] caused severe emotional distress to [the plaintiff]’”
  • “[When plaintiff’s] . . . common-law claims implicitly assert that his rights . . . are superior to [defendant’s] rights under the CBA[, t]he only way such allegations could be adjudicated would be to interpret [defendant’s rights] under the CBA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.