District of Columbia· 9/25/2007
Grandison v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.
Citations
- 514 F. Supp. 2d 12
- 182 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2992
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70459
- 2007 WL 2781892
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing claim because the plaintiff merely “allege[d], in conclusory fashion, that [the defendant’s] actions in terminating [the plaintiff] were ‘extreme and outrageous and willfully performed [and] caused severe emotional distress to [the plaintiff]’”
- “[When plaintiff’s] . . . common-law claims implicitly assert that his rights . . . are superior to [defendant’s] rights under the CBA[, t]he only way such allegations could be adjudicated would be to interpret [defendant’s rights] under the CBA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beyene v. Washington Hilton LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-30· cited 36×
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2011-12-06· cited 28×
- The CUNEO LAW GROUP, PC v. JosephDistrict of Columbia· 2009-11-19· cited 23×
- Washington, Jr. v. Alliedbarton Security Services, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-15· cited 7×
- Miniter v. Sun Myung MoonDistrict of Columbia· 2010-09-07· cited 5×
- Brown v. Potomac Elec. Power Co.D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-30· cited 4×
- Grandison v. WACKENHUT SERVICES, INC.District of Columbia· 2008-11-13· cited 2×
- Miniter v. MoonDistrict of Columbia· 2010-09-07
- Cuneo Law Group, P.CDistrict of Columbia· 2009-11-19
- Brown v. Potomac Electric Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2018-03-30
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 2,375×
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,828×
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 1,521×
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-30· cited 463×
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. HechlerSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 462×
- Macharia, Merania v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2003-07-11· cited 441×
- Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. AshcroftD.C. Circuit· 2003-06-20· cited 439×
- Lansalot A. Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper CompanyNinth Circuit· 1984-08-21· cited 160×
- Yates v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2003-04-11· cited 137×
- Frank Chmiel v. Beverly Wilshire Hotel Company Regent International Hotels, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 1989-05-03· cited 88×
- Than v. Radio Free AsiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-04-30· cited 10×
- Symonds v. Day & Zimmerman, IncFifth Circuit· 1992-12-15· cited 1×
Other cases named Grandison v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.