Skip to main content
· 10/17/1994

Grandison v. Schaefer

Citations

  • 37 F.3d 1493
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34822
  • 1994 WL 564734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that because Plaintiff's second motion for reconsideration did “nothing more than restate his earlier claims,” the district court's summary denial of the motion was not an abuse of discretion.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.