Skip to main content
· 4/29/2022

Grande Voiture D'Ohio La Societe Des 40 Hommes Et 8 Chevaux v. Simpson

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1422

Syllabus

In this appeal of a foreclosure judgment, appellant asserts that the trial court erred by granting appellee's motion for summary judgment and by overruling his motion for summary judgment. Appellant also asserts that the trial court erred by overruling a motion to intervene as a matter of right filed by an entity that has been found not to lawfully exist. The trial court did not err by granting summary judgment to appellee and overruling appellant's summary judgment motion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling the motion to intervene. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.