Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. Winget

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “‘[a] judgment will not be reversed for any error in the record introduced by or invited by the party seeking reversal.’ Syllabus point 21, State v. Riley, 151 W.Va. 364, 151 S.E.2d 308 (1966).”
• Mother's repeated use of controlled substances in front of her three children constituted emotional “abuse” of the children for purposes of adjudicating the children as abused and/or neglected.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).