Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. United States Attorney for the Western District of Michigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that parcel sought by Grand Traverse Band was “located in an area of historical and cultural significance to the Band that was previously ceded to the United States”
• inventing temporal limitation and then, without explicit reference to any set criteria, determining that lands were “part of the first systematic effort ■ to restore tribal lands”
• discussing Pokagon Band’s “essentially identical history to the Grand Traverse Band”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).