Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. American Wood Working Machinery Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discovery was appropriate when plaintiff states a claim of violation of a clearly established law and the parties disagree as to what actions the defendants took
• stay of discovery may be appropriate while resolving entitlement to qualified immunity, as such immunity exists to protect government from litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).