· 5/21/1917
Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. United States
Citations
- 244 U.S. 645
- 37 S. Ct. 651
- 61 L. Ed. 1369
- 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the APA does not create substantive rights, which instead arise from statutes, rules, or regulations
- finding WVBOE has authority to modify local board closure plan “even though the school closure statutes . . . did not expressly so provide.”
- finding aggrieved parties to closure had no remedy under Administrative Procedures Act, W. Va. Code § 29A-1-2(b)
- finding aggrieved parties to closure had no remedy under Administrative Procedures Act, W. Va. (continued . . .
- APA does not create substantive rights, as such rights must exist either by statutory language creating agency hearing, by agency’s rules & regulations or by some constitutional command
- APA does not create substantive rights, as such rights must exist either by statutory language creating agency hearing, by agency's rules & regulations or by some constitutional command
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.