Skip to main content
· 5/21/1917

Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 244 U.S. 645
  • 37 S. Ct. 651
  • 61 L. Ed. 1369
  • 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the APA does not create substantive rights, which instead arise from statutes, rules, or regulations
  • finding WVBOE has authority to modify local board closure plan “even though the school closure statutes . . . did not expressly so provide.”
  • finding aggrieved parties to closure had no remedy under Administrative Procedures Act, W. Va. Code § 29A-1-2(b)
  • finding aggrieved parties to closure had no remedy under Administrative Procedures Act, W. Va. (continued . . .
  • APA does not create substantive rights, as such rights must exist either by statutory language creating agency hearing, by agency’s rules & regulations or by some constitutional command
  • APA does not create substantive rights, as such rights must exist either by statutory language creating agency hearing, by agency's rules & regulations or by some constitutional command

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.