Skip to main content
· 6/6/2008

GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Peters

Citations

  • 560 F. Supp. 2d 1270
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44907
  • 2008 WL 2370168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the longer defendants have been on notice of the class’ claims weighs in favor of relation back
  • recognizing that increasing the size of the class could justify not allowing relation back
  • holding that an amended complaint adding a new plaintiff that asserted the same claim as the original plaintiff and fit within the originally defined class related back to the original complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard A. Lazzara

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.