· 11/4/1992
Grand Ex Rel. United States v. Northrop Corp.
Citations
- 811 F. Supp. 333
- 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 668
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20674
- 1992 WL 424054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that six year limitations period set forth in 31 U.S.C. § 3731(b)(1) applied to plaintiff suing under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h
- concluding that the disclosure statement should be produced after an in camera review and the redaction of the opinions and analysis of the relator’s counsel by the court
- rejecting reasoning of Truong and holding that internal whistleblowers retaliation suit was subject to limitations period in 3731(b)
- “[A] court should not enforce the plain meaning of a statute if it would lead to an absurd or odd result.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spiegel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.