Skip to main content
· 11/4/1992

Grand Ex Rel. United States v. Northrop Corp.

Citations

  • 811 F. Supp. 333
  • 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 668
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20674
  • 1992 WL 424054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that six year limitations period set forth in 31 U.S.C. § 3731(b)(1) applied to plaintiff suing under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h
  • concluding that the disclosure statement should be produced after an in camera review and the redaction of the opinions and analysis of the relator’s counsel by the court
  • rejecting reasoning of Truong and holding that internal whistleblowers retaliation suit was subject to limitations period in 3731(b)
  • “[A] court should not enforce the plain meaning of a statute if it would lead to an absurd or odd result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spiegel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.