Grand Canyon Trust v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff’s challenge to a 2009 BiOp and 2010 ITS was 16 moot because a 2011 BiOp and 2011 ITS, which were issued after the plaintiff filed its notice of appeal, superseded the earlier documents and purported to “cover the operation of the Dam through 2020”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).