Grammer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We believe 7 To prove the lesser mens rea element of knowingly, the State would have to prove that appellant was aware that his conduct was reasonably certain to cause the result of either: (1) not successfully completing the SAFPF program; or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tony Dorsett Hille v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2012-08-28
• Martin Luther Burns v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-02-12
• Quinton Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-18
• Juan Antonio Deleon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2016-11-08
• Nile Ali Irsan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2018-06-27
• Dante Crenshaw v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2023-06-15
• Desiree Johnson v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2023-11-09
• Luis Ernesto Araujo v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2025-02-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Issa v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-29· cited 308×
• Hardeman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-15· cited 262×
• Pearson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-09· cited 243×
• Grammer v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-09-10· cited 8×