Skip to main content

Grammens v. Dollar

Citations

  • 697 S.E.2d 775
  • 287 Ga. 618
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2181
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding teacher shielded by official immunity because school policy did not define key term, therefore requiring teacher to exercise discretion in implementation of the policy
  • noting that public officer is personally liable for acts negligently performed or acts performed with malice or an intent to injure
  • finding that because a written policy did not define a term, it required a teacher to engage in a discretionary act
  • stating that official is entitled to immunity unless plaintiff can show that officer acted with actual malice or an intent to injure in undertaking his discretionary acts of hiring and retaining em- ployees
  • teacher failed to offer eye protection to student, who was subsequently injured during science experiment
  • written policy requiring eye protection when students use “explosive materials” required discretion because that term was not defined, requiring teacher to determine if policy applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Hunstein, Carley, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.