Grainger & Co. v. Jeffries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “What C.P.L.R. §§ 5225 and 5227 provide, in contrast to a plenary- action, is a procedural mechanism for attacking a fraudulent conveyance ..., colloquially known as ‘turnover proceedings.’”
• “What C.P.L.R. §§ 5225 and 5227 provide, in contrast to a plenary action, is a procedural mechanism for attacking a fraudulent conveyance by a judgment debtor, colloquially known as ‘turnover proceedings.’”
• \A special proceeding is a creature of New York law with no federal analogue.\ (quoting S.E.C. v. Colonial Inv. Mgmt., LLC, No. 07 Civ. 8849, 2010 WL 4159276 , at -4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2010) )
• “If there is one area of the law that has little regard for form over substance, it is fraudulent conveyance law, for parties and their lawyers frequently demonstrate ingenuity in attempting to camouflage the economic reality of transactions with distressed companies.”
• ʺWhat 37 15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 C.P.L.R. §§ 5225 and 5227 provide, in contrast to a plenary action, is a procedural 2 mechanism for attacking a fraudulent conveyance . . . , colloquially known as 3 ʹturnover proceedings.ʹʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).