Skip to main content
· 5/29/1912

Graham v. Swann

Citations

  • 148 Ky. 608
  • 147 S.W. 11
  • 1912 Ky. LEXIS 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing though Staub’s analysis of cat’s paw is within the context of USERRA, it applies to Title VII cases as well, and citing cases where courts have concluded that Staub’s cat’s paw analysis applies to Title VII cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.