Graham v. Stucken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “proper procedure” for a plaintiff to assert a new claim at summary judgment is to amend the complaint in accordance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)
• noting that a plaintiff cannot amend the complaint through briefing and further acknowledging that, in opposing a dispositive motion, “the proper procedure for plaintiffs to assert a new claim is to amend the complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).”
• “A plaintiff may not amend his complaint through arguments in his brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment.”
• “A plaintiff may not amend his complaint through arguments in his brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment.” (quotations omitted)
• “A plaintiff may not amend his complaint through arguments in his brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment.”
• administrative filings raising purely personal concerns are not covered by the First Amendment right to petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).