Graham v. Lake Cty. JFS/CSEA
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 2321
Syllabus
On Respondent's objections to a Report and Recommendation, the Court overruled the objections and adopted the Report and Recommendation. Since Respondent did not object to the lack of an express ruling by the Special Master on Respondent's Motion To Dismiss, the Court rendered no ruling on Respondent's Motion To Dismiss in the first instance. The Court ordered Respondent to produce to Requester certain records. And the Court determined that Requester was entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by the Requester, excepting attorney fees.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ___ for the Court of Appeals to draw inferences from known facts was an \inappropriate\ exercise in factfinding
- noting that arbitration decisions resulting from fraud or arbitrator dishonesty and fraud can be set aside
- requiring the arbitrator to “act[] within the scope of his authority”
- \it must be remembered that grievance and arbitration procedures are part and parcel of the ongoing process of collective bargaining\
- “The parties did not bargain for the facts to be found by a court, but by an arbitrator chosen by them.... ”
- to refuse to enforce an arbitration award, the alleged violation of public policy must be clearly shown
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sadler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.