E.D. Pennsylvania· 3/5/2003
Graham v. Johnson
Citations
- 249 F. Supp. 2d 563
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3443
- 2003 WL 925836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a lack of protectible property interest in employment with the Philadelphia Police Department does not preclude employee from bringing a claim for a post-termination name-clearing hearing
- concluding that a lack of a protectable property interest in employment with the Philadelphia Police Department does not preclude employee from bringing a claim for a post- termination name-clearing hearing
- both answering the question “yes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schiller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Other cases named Graham v. Johnson
13 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Graham v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1999-03-31
- Graham v. JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1978-03-15
- Graham v. JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1978-08-07
- Graham v. JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1978-10-17
- Graham v. JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1979-10-29
- Graham v. JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1980-06-12
- Graham v. JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1980-06-26
- Graham v. JohnsonS.D. Texas· 1999-01-07
- Graham v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-24
- Graham v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2000-05-01
- Graham v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2000-05-01
- Graham v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2004-04-19
- Graham v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2004-04-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.